Back to Browse Magazine

2025 - November and December - page 24

Image details

Issue number 404
ISSN 2632-7171
Publication date 1st November 2025
Transcription magazine Feature
Archives and
Institutional Histories
of Slavery
In this article, Hannah Murphy, Senior Lecturer in Early
Modern History and Director at the Centre for Early
Modern Studies (CEMS) at Kings College, writes about
the genesis of the London Records of Slavery Network
and the launch of a new toolkit to help record-keepers
with these often contentious and difficult records.
s an early modern historian, I used to think I
knew a lot about archives. My first book was
based on the kind of archival work typically
referred to as ‘extensive’: two years’ near-daily work
in archives in Nuremberg, working through civic
and medical documents in German and Latin. I
learned languages, palaeography, and got to grips
with card catalogues and nineteenth-century archival
classifications. Nuremberg’s idiosyncratic archival
structure sparked an interest in the history of collection
formation, and I have researched and written about the
history of record-keeping and its relation to domestic
and colonial medicine and rule. Even when dealing with
difficult information, I still experience the visceral thrill of
a face-to-face encounter with historical documentation. I
love archives: I think most historians do.
So, when I began a new project, to examine the role
of medical expertise in transatlantic slavery, I was
committed to a process of archival research. My project
kicked off in January 2021, right around the time that
new projects were emerging on institutions and slavery
in major London institutions, like Lloyds and the
Bank of England. It seemed like a natural extension to
reach out to those involved, and so I emailed a newly
appointed archivist in the City of London, hoping to
learn more about the sources available for research.
Our meeting gave rise to a different kind of encounter,
with a growing number of other curators, librarians and
archivists across City institutions undertaking research
into their own institutions’ histories with transatlantic
slavery.
24